Quick summary
A passenger on United Express Flight 3626 from Rochester, New York, to Newark, New Jersey, on September 3, 2026, has filed complaints with both the FAA and the FBI after alleging that a male seatmate masturbated during the flight, that crew directed her back to her assigned seat for landing despite no alternative being available, and that the male passenger was allowed to leave Newark without being questioned by police. United Airlines has confirmed it is investigating. The airline’s response to date includes a $100 flight credit — against a ticket cost she says was approximately $400.
The passenger has escalated to federal authorities, and the FBI opened 104 sexual-assault investigations involving aircraft in 2024 alone. What the airline’s investigation finds — and whether law enforcement acts — will determine whether this stays a customer-service dispute or becomes something more serious.
Twenty days after a domestic United Express flight landed at Newark, the passenger at the centre of an alleged in-flight sexual misconduct complaint has taken her case to two federal agencies — and the airline is still investigating. The incident, reported on September 3, has moved from a gate-agent conversation to formal FBI and FAA complaints, raising pointed questions about what US carriers are actually required to do when a passenger reports misconduct mid-flight.
The passenger, a 25-year-old paediatric crisis therapist from western New York, says she alerted cabin crew after noticing the man seated beside her was masturbating. Crew allowed her to stand in the aisle for roughly an hour. For descent, landing, and taxiing — because her seat was near the rear of the cabin — she was directed back to her assigned seat, with crew telling her only three to five minutes remained. The male passenger walked off the aircraft at Newark without being questioned or detained.
At the gate, she says a United employee asked what she expected them to do and told her contacting police was her responsibility. A second United employee later told her that standard procedures had not been followed. The airline’s written response acknowledged the experience was “upsetting and uncomfortable” — language she said failed to reflect what she had actually reported. Then came the $100 credit.
United has confirmed an active investigation but has not disclosed findings. The passenger has now filed with both the FAA and the FBI.
What federal law says — and what the airline did
Under 49 U.S.C. § 46506(2), indecent or obscene acts committed aboard a US commercial aircraft can be prosecuted as federal offences, carrying up to 90 days in jail and a fine of up to $5,000. That statute puts incidents like this squarely within FBI jurisdiction — not airline customer-relations.
The FBI’s own guidance, published on its crimes-aboard-aircraft page, is explicit: notify cabin crew during the flight so that law enforcement can potentially meet the aircraft after landing and speak with witnesses while they are still present. That window closes the moment passengers are allowed to deplane. In this case, the male passenger was gone before any law enforcement contact occurred.
The operating picture adds a layer of complexity. United Express is a brand, not a single airline. Republic Airways confirms on its passenger information page that it operates regional flying for United alongside partnerships with American Airlines and Delta. An aviation flight-information source identifies Republic Airways as the likely operator of Flight 3626 on the Rochester–Newark corridor, with an Embraer E175 as the aircraft — though that detail is not confirmed by an official flight record. When a passenger files a complaint, they may be dealing with United’s commercial team, the regional operator’s onboard procedures, and federal law enforcement as three entirely separate tracks.
| Carrier | Reported incident | Airline response | Law enforcement outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Airlines (2018) | Male seatmate allegedly exposed himself on flight to Chicago O’Hare | $75 flight credit | Police said airline had not contacted them |
| United Airlines (2020 lawsuit) | Repeated sexual harassment complaints on multiple flights | $150 vouchers reported | Lawsuit filed; outcome not publicly confirmed |
| United Express (September 2026) | Male seatmate allegedly masturbating; ROC–EWR Flight 3626 | $100 flight credit | Male passenger allowed to leave without questioning |
| American Airlines (Orlando–Dallas) | Male passenger allegedly fondling himself in cabin | 5,000 bonus miles | Man allowed to leave without questioning |
| American Airlines (first class, separate case) | Passenger reported male masturbating nearby | Not publicly disclosed | Lawsuit filed alleging improper response |
The FBI reported 104 sexual-assault investigations involving aircraft in 2024 — and has said that figure likely understates actual prevalence because many incidents go unreported.
Superdeals cover departures from North America, Europe and Australia.
Flight deals most people never see
Air Traveler Club monitors thousands of routes for pricing anomalies that traditional search engines miss. With ATC Superdeals members save up to 80% on each flight vs. regular fares.
Too good to be true? Check it out yourself. It's free.
Delivered weekly. Unsubscribe anytime.
Why a flight credit is not the same as an incident report
The $100 credit is a commercial gesture. It says nothing about whether the incident was documented during the flight, whether crew attempted to record witness information before passengers deplaned, or whether any law enforcement agency was notified in time to act. Those are the questions that determine whether a complaint becomes an investigation — and they have answers only if the right steps happen in the right sequence while the aircraft is still on the ground.
United’s investigation remains active, and no official finding has been made public confirming or rejecting the passenger’s account. That means the credit should be read as evidence of how the airline’s customer-relations function responded — not as any kind of conclusion about what happened on the flight or whether procedures were followed.
The broader pattern across US carriers is hard to ignore. In case after case — going back at least to 2018 — the reported response has been a small goodwill credit and no police contact before the alleged perpetrator left the airport. That pattern is precisely what the FBI’s guidance is designed to interrupt: get law enforcement to the gate before the aircraft empties.
Steps to take if you witness or experience in-flight misconduct
On US domestic routes, the window for law enforcement to act closes the moment passengers deplane — these steps must happen in sequence, and timing is everything.
- Alert crew immediately and ask explicitly: Tell a flight attendant what you observed and ask whether airport police or the FBI will be requested to meet the aircraft on arrival. Get a name if possible. The FBI’s guidance is clear that crew notification during the flight is the trigger for post-landing law enforcement contact.
- Request a seat change on the record: Ask crew to document the request and the reason. If no seat is available, ask them to note that in writing. This creates a paper trail that matters if the incident is later disputed.
- Do not leave the gate area immediately: If law enforcement does meet the aircraft, your account as a witness is time-sensitive. Stay until you have spoken with an officer or confirmed no law enforcement is present.
- File with the FBI directly: Reports can be submitted at tips.fbi.gov or by calling 1-800-CALL-FBI. A complaint to the airline does not substitute for a federal report, and the two processes run independently.
- Keep everything: Boarding pass, seat assignment confirmation, any written communications from the airline, and the flight number. These are the documents that support both a federal complaint and any subsequent legal action.
Watch: United’s investigation is active with no public timeline. If the airline discloses procedural findings — particularly whether crew followed its own incident-reporting protocols — that disclosure will set a visible standard against which future complaints on United Express flights can be measured.
Questions? Answers.
Does filing a complaint with the FBI guarantee that the alleged perpetrator will be charged?
A complaint to the FBI does not establish that a crime occurred and does not guarantee prosecution. The FBI will assess whether the reported conduct falls within federal jurisdiction under statutes such as 49 U.S.C. § 46506 and whether sufficient evidence exists to proceed. Many investigations are opened without resulting in charges.
Is a passenger entitled to a seat reassignment if they report misconduct mid-flight?
No US regulation explicitly guarantees a seat reassignment in response to a misconduct report. Whether a move is possible depends on aircraft load and crew discretion. What passengers can do is ask crew to document the request and the reason — creating a record that the report was made and that a reassignment was sought.
Who is responsible when a United Express flight is operated by a regional carrier like Republic Airways?
United sells the ticket and controls the brand, but the aircraft, crew, and onboard procedures belong to the operating carrier — in this case, reportedly Republic Airways. A complaint may need to be filed separately with both entities. Check your booking confirmation for the “operated by” field to identify the actual carrier before departure.
Is a $100 flight credit a standard response to in-flight misconduct complaints?
There is no published US regulatory standard for compensation in misconduct cases — flight credits are a discretionary customer-relations tool, not a regulated remedy. Prior reported cases involving similar allegations have resulted in credits ranging from $75 to $150 or small loyalty-mile awards. None of these constitute a finding about what occurred or whether airline procedures were followed.